• null@piefed.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Good journalism, I guess? Why are you fighting so hard to defend a deliberately misleading headline…?

      • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Because it’s accurate, not misleading. They banned that criticism, they are taking an anti-trans stance.

        Trans rights are human rights. Are you a bot? I can’t imagine why else you don’t care about your own rights.

          • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            They literally restricted a piece of valid criticism from being published.

            You want to pretend that’s not the same as “banning”? I can’t stop you from being wrong.

            But I can call you a shithead for supporting it. Shithead.

            • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              They literally asked for a post that was posted to their account without approval to be removed and go through the proper approval process.

              You want to pretend that’s the same as “banning” criticism? I can’t stop you from being wrong.

              But I can call you a shithead for supporting deceptive journalism. Shithead.

              • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                But they did not provide a method for reposting the criticism, they replaced it with a useless offer.

                You can call me a shithead. And I can say… “No, you.”

                But we may be at the end of productivity when it comes to our conversation. I believe they banned/censored a piece of valid and potentially life-saving criticism.

                • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  But they did not provide a method for reposting the criticism

                  They specifically said they submitted it for proper approval. No where does it say that was denied…

                  they replaced it with a useless offer.

                  You’re inferring that. Were you there? Do you know what was discussed? Based on their statement, the ODPC seems to disagree with you.

                  You can call me a shithead. And I can say… “No, you.”

                  Or you could try actually defending your claim instead of hurling petty insults and attacking strawmen.

                  • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Or you could try actually defending your claim instead

                    I did. You’re making more assumptions than I am.

                    Where does it say they were allowed to repost their criticism? Nowhere? Interesting. Kinda like… Kinda like they banned it.