• raman_klogius@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why is it that most kinds of wire fraud are seriously prosecuted by the courts but they turn a blind eye on copyright fraud?

  • ShadowRam@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Simple legislative solution.

    Anything generated by AI in full or partially, is not eligible be copy-righted.

    and just like patents, prove you didn’t use AI via showing process of creation.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, I would say the way to make this work would be that you have to promise that it doesn’t use AI tools. If there’s evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you did, then you lose all copyright, from the past and future. Everything you’ve made becomes public domain.

      • Chais@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        The logical conclusion of that would be that nothing created after the introduction of “AI” will ever be copyrightable, which would be an amazingly ironic twist of jurisdiction.

    • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      I read that’s the position some courts have already taken, as they should.

      Copyright can only be applied to a creative work, and that can only be created by a human being.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think I need to know where Disney lands in this issue.

        Though I guess it remains to be seen if they have the funds to fight the AI VC juggernaut that comprises basically all the growth in the American economy in the last 4 years.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          i’m pretty sure this is the primary reason disney divested from AI video generation. they realized they couldn’t successfully lobby the law in to allow AI to own IP rights and be the primary beneficiary of that law.

    • raman_klogius@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is fraud, plain and simple. It baffles me how nobody is calling it what it is, and use funny words like trolling. Trolls don’t actively defraud other people of their rightful income from copyrighted works.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah this was bound to happen. I hope for some magic reason that they’ll be all shut down but the musician

    • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Headline is click bait. This is a classic scammer copying music to ear the musicians royalties, not an “AI company”.

  • drewaustin@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Strangely, this post doesn’t really have anything to do with AI per-se. The exact same exploit is actively being exploited on YouTube and music streaming services without AI. AI is just a boogeyman feature of the exploit in this case and doesn’t really seemed to have played any real part in it.