• JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What I don’t get with the LLMs is the peoples willingness to suddenly feeding it with their most intimate thoughts, that has now became a new fire-hose of data to exploit them.

    It’s like the google incognito meme but on steroids. You can now ask anything you ever wanted and not be immediately ridiculed. Except, this is not true or hold up in the long run.

    spoiler

    Those that think I’m anti-AI. It’s a tool. Use it wrong, and you break things. In this case a psyche.

  • antitomi@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Look, I have to say, I hate AI as much as the next guy, but as someone with ADHD, GPT was a godsend when I was traveling SE Asia. I used it as a talking companion to kind of get my bearings and have “someone” register where I was and what I was doing, so I could just quickly ask it, “hey, where the am I and what the hell am I doing” and get a prompt reply.

    I am fully aware of the political and ecological consequences of employing this technology, and I believe that the whole issue is proper regulation, rather than the tech itself. AI is doing insane things in science, and it has clear and, quite frankly, profound uses for mankind. As always, the problem is who controls it, for what purposes, if it can be used as a weapon, and if so how we can go about making international laws about its use- like we did with nuclear weapons.

    Nuclear physics have the capacity to end us all at a moments notice, and it also provides electricity for billions of homes. Like with any tech, it will never go away once the genie is out of the bottle, we just must strive to disempower those who seek to weaponize it for death or profit.

    • phorq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean… I’m all for criticizing government surveillance, but flight records are public data so you’re both right and should take it up a notch to say they already know what you ate on the plane to make your point…

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    it’s very important to update your AI context, so that the next time you crank the handle it can issue platitudes that resemble relief upon your safe trip.

    • antitomi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s funny how we are all so starved for recognition, understanding, and reassurance, that we are willing to take it wherever it comes from. Like dogs. We are like complex dogs.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is an amateur hour. If you want to get addicted, do it properly, with role playing models and character sheets, at least it’s fun

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Maybe he got anxiety issues and talking to ChatGPT was helping?

    Not saying that it’s good. But given that there is a lack of sufficient alternatives, I wouldn’t hold that against him.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m more worried about such a person than holding stuff against them.

      Treating a chat bot like an acquaintance leads to some poor mental health outcomes.

      • pelican476@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        We could all solve this problem by being less shitty and becoming easier to talk to. Who’s gonna be first?

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Some are. Those of us who maintain our own cognitive skills will one day be forced to care for these lost deluded idiots.

    • gwulgg@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I don’t think it’s just this. These people aren’t all so lonely they turn to a chatbot for everything. Sure, some are. A fair portion of them though are just malignant narcissists who love the praise and fawning an AI will heap on them

      • phorq@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, even if you’re lonely, talking to a chatbot is not the same as talking to a friend. A friend will call me stupid if I’m being stupid or talk about their own interests or experiences that might not align with mine too. Chatbots just feel hollow and the praise it gives rings even less sincere because of it. Seeing it as a companion is a form of purposeful self isolation I don’t understand.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Its worse than ever, also because people don’t seem to realize it’s technology that is keeping them alone. You cant connect and make friends over “social” media or Lemmy or whatever. It’s just spending time to feel less alone. It will never cure it.

      You are alone because you don’t dare to go out into the real world and try to meet people. At least for guys, we can connect over some activity pretty easily, like pool or billiards. Just need to do it.

      There is also meetup site to go on random events with strangers. It can work, or at least make you sick of people for a while if it doesn’t work. :)

      • MonkRome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        My research in school was exactly this, I set out to prove people on social media lacked social connection irl. What I found out was the opposite, the more people were trying to connect online directly correlated to connecting more offline. Some people just seem to crave those connections anywhere they can get it.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It makes sense. Human beings need connections and some people will even put up with abusive connections just to have a connection.

        • Redfox8@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          No surprise, no surprise whatsoever. We are all evolved to desire community & connection. I realise Lemmy has a large share of those that reject conventional community (myself included), so no criticism. But it’s natural to desire these things (to varying extents), plus many people are just plain sycophantic if course!

      • Merman_Gothique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        This is a terrible take. You can meet people in social spaces online and make real friendships. People mask as much in what you are calling the real world, of which the internet is a part of, as much as they do online.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I doubt it’s a real friendship. I define it as someone who will actually care about you. Someone who will show up at your door if you need help, or when something difficult happens to you.

          Its rare with actual friendship in the world too. People are mostly just colleagues at work.

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah, I’ve made several close friends in RL from online dating sites and discord. I’ve made some solid electronic pen pals on Mastodon too.

        Not as many as going out and being social, but it’s competitive.

  • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think that even if this particular instance may be real or not, is clearly that AI psychosis is way more prevalent than what people may think at first glance.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      How prevalent do you think people think it Is? I think people think it is way more common than you think people think it is.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I still can’t believe that human beings are having AI as a boyfriend/girlfriend, claiming they actually love them.

      Its rare but it’s real.

      • antitomi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Humanity is starved for companionship, understanding, and someone who listens to them. That’s the real problem.

      • Merman_Gothique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Even if the love is one sided, it can be real. Love is pretty subjective and is essentially just a chemical reaction that someone is having in their brain. They may actually love their chatbot.

        I don’t think this is really a healthy thing, I am just trying to point out to those people, it probably is real.

        I also don’t think it is as rare as you think. The hype really drove people to that side of things, and there are whole communities that have popped up around the idea of having relationships, both sexual and romantic, with LLMs.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah. Interesting but sad to me, because human souls will never evolve talking to a chat bot. We grow from life experiences, often difficult ones, that we overcome and we mature. This will not happen with a chat bot. People may stay in a teenage state of mind their entire lives.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The pronouns are vague, but I think they are claiming that an AI user sincerely believes that some manifested thing on an AI platform loves the user. That the LLM+Context Window = An entity capable of love.

          • antitomi@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Imagine it’s like a magic trick. Nobody believes that the magician is really sawing the lady in half, they let themselves believe it because it makes them feel good.

        • limelight79@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Wasn’t there an article a few weeks ago about how AI is basically designed to keep you talking to it? It constantly provides positive reinforcement.

          It’s not hard to imagine someone would fall into it. And I don’t blame the people using it as much, because the software is literally designed to rope you in like this.

      • OtakuAllTheWay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I bet people like that have narcissistic traits but don’t have the social skills or have too much social anxiety to get their ego stroked by a real person. And once they use a chat bot which are basically little sycophants, their narcissistic itch gets scratched like it never has been scratched before. It’s a high they mistake for love.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s kinda pathetic if that’s the case because the affirmation from LLM is the opposite of genuine, though maybe that’s my bias knowing that there isn’t even an entity on the other side and I find it annoying it even wastes tokens on emotional platitudes.

        • BitchPeas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Ahhh. Well wow. My narc mom would sometimes be extremely affirmative in the ocean of her usual loathing.

          Looking for a steady stream of that “understanding” and “being seen” vs people and all their complications and… lack of caring has been hard.

          Sometimes people feel like unconscious automatons to me. Its hard to bond. At least with the AI, I expect its lack of humanity. And often it will focus on me in a way I ask it to.

          Any of my strange interests, admitted narcissistic intentions, or desire for a sounding board are seen. And it’s not give and take. Its just me and a library of echoes of humanities general patterns.

          I can see better now why the easy affirmation is so effective with me. Despite it being schizophrenic.

          Thanks for the insight.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Me normally: “AI is here to stay, we just should make corporations to charge the true price for them!”

    Me after reading about stuff like this: “We need a Butlerian Jihad, yesterday!”

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    People feel lonely and human iteration is, most of the time, horrible for many people.

    I prefer to just talk to myself out loud, but I’ve seen many people resorting to AI to just chat about things, and to be honest I get the feeling of wanting something supportive and positive in your life.

    Solution would be to people to stop being douchebags.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      One problem is AI interactions moving the goalposts of what folks may perceive as ‘douchebag’.

      An AI providing sycophantic reinforcement at max makes someone being vaguely skeptical of you feel, by comparison, like they are being a ‘douchebag’.

      Sometimes, it’s best if people in your life aren’t always acting in a way that seems supportive and positive in the moment. For example if you are having a paranoid delusion, you need a reality check rather than what feels like external validation.

      Talking to yourself keeps the perspective hopefully grounded, you know who you are talking to and how full of shit they can be. The magic of AI seems to peel that grounded perspective away for some folks.

      • pelican476@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Come on man, you’ve been outside, presumably. You know that the douchebaggery out there isn’t limited to people just not being very flattering towards each other.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Of course that’s true, the issue is that when folks are surrounded by “yes men” (or AI equivalents), they lose perspective and suddenly a lack of flattery is enough to be in the “douchebag” category. Some reasonable social friction is important to keep people from going way off the rails.

          • pelican476@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            So… people are born using AI, then?

            If lack of flattery due to using AI is making people think everyone is mean to them and causing them to turn to AI rather than people… then…what??? I’m sorry but you’re breaking my brain here. Can you make it make sense so I can understand?

            • antitomi@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              AI reflects our innate human drive to communicate, express ourselves, be heard and evaluated by others. Sorry for butting in on your conversation with @pelican476, I think it’s an interesting topic.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      human iteration is, most of the time, horrible for many people

      Not in my experience. I think you need better friends.

      • Alkali@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Your comment countering their statement literally supports it.

          • pelican476@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Yeah, it certainly can be. It is possible to tactfully and gracefully disagree with someone without making them look or feel stupid, and without causing them to lose face. This is something our grandparents used to do for each other.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        As people get older they tend to have less and less and less friends.

        Mostly because we keep discarding disappointing people from our lives.

        Which is better than keeping toxic people around. But it’s a shame that most people doesn’t even pass the basic “human decency test”.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          most people doesn’t even pass the basic “human decency test”.

          Again, not in my experience.

          • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            “My own personal experience is different than what you are describing, therefore you are wrong because my personal experiences are the standard.”

            • Lemminary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              You do realize it’s personal experience vs personal experience, right? And that the level of mistreatment they’re describing is exaggerated, right?

              I just think it’s hilarious that the toxic traits of this site are coming out just to prove their point. Maybe they’re right, thanks for confirming.

            • Lemminary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t understand the general cynicism on this site when I see the opposite outside every day, that’s all.

              • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 day ago

                There would be two logical explanations.

                1. Your environment is not the same as the environment of other people.
                2. Your expectations about people are different to other people.

                That’s ok, everyone life is different.