LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zoneM to WomensStuff@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 12 days agoDo you agree?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square72linkfedilinkarrow-up1129arrow-down10
arrow-up1129arrow-down1imageDo you agree?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zoneM to WomensStuff@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square72linkfedilink
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·12 days agoWe are talking about women’s roles as protectors. Context matters. I am not saying that those criteria define women.
minus-square𝙈𝙞𝙖@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 days agoSo women without them are not protectors? It’s problematic language and thinking, and like I said it’s upsetting to see it here.
We are talking about women’s roles as protectors. Context matters.
I am not saying that those criteria define women.
So women without them are not protectors?
It’s problematic language and thinking, and like I said it’s upsetting to see it here.
No, that’s not what I said.