• Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    No we don’t.

    Considering that TSA, a part of DHS, let more than 90% of guns get through when tested speaks volumes. The new statistics on that have been classified so I guess we just trust then when they say they’ve caught as lot of guns.

    Know why you go through this scanners at the airport? Because a former congressman owns (owned?) a large stake in the company that produces them.

    Our intelligence knew all about 9/11 before it happened. A whole new agency wasn’t necessary, just new rules.

    Considering all of the laws ICE is breaking in the name of punishing what amounts to a misdemeanor, I think we could go back to not having them.

    But you know what we COULD use? How about some healthcare?

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    No, that’s what the FBI is for.

    They saw a problem after 9-11 (government agencies not communicating), and decided to solve it by adding further government agencies, all of which compete with each other for budget.

    BRILLIANT