Democrats spent the last year asking where their Joe Rogan was. Hasan Piker is one of the few left-wing figures with the audience they covet — but the party is deeply hostile to the spontaneity and independence that make figures like him appealing.

  • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Yep. And let’s not forget, just as recently as a year ago, Lemmy would ban people for saying “both parties suck.” And anyone who supported third-parties were pounded on and called russians and nazis. That still happens, but not as much anymore, thank goodness.

    Finally more and more people here are starting to come around to realizing that neither the democrats nor the republicans want to help us plebs.

    Both parties do suck and as long as people keep shooing away third-party voters, they’ll continue to suck. Remember guys, the only reason third-parties are weak is because you all refuse to support them.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep. And let’s not forget, just as recently as a year ago, Lemmy would ban people for saying “both parties suck.” And anyone who supported third-parties were pounded on and called russians and nazis. That still happens, but not as much any more, thank goodness.

      Yeah, because context matters. The political environment when you’re in the middle of the general election and infighting accomplishes fuck-all except to help the enemy is entirety different from the one when it’s time to find new primary candidates and there’s an opportunity for dissent to actually serve a useful purpose.

      • Velma@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Weird how attempting to control peoples opinions online didn’t win Harris the presidency then.

        Maybe the focus should’ve been on earnestly listening to concerns from the leftists under the umbrella instead of silencing them.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          IT WAS TOO FUCKING LATE FOR THAT! Harris was the candidate. End of. There was zero possibility of replacing her with somebody more leftist. The choices were only “vote for Harris” or “help Trump.” That’s it.

          Game theory is MATH, not an opinion!

          Did you think I wanted that class traitor prosecutor bitch either?! Fuck, no! But, being someone who isn’t a goddamn drooling moron, I realized that Trump was even worse and held my nose. That’s how the system works, and it does not care how much you or I both hate it.

          Nobody was trying to “control people’s opinions;” we were trying to stop you from making an objective mathematical error that would destroy us all.

          • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            The choices were only “vote for Harris” or “help Trump.”

            Or vote third party. Which I proudly did. And will do again unless the Democrats stop fucking shit up.

            Did you think I wanted that class traitor prosecutor bitch either?! Fuck, no!

            So why didn’t you speak up? Was it because you knew Lemmy would censor you? Do you think it’s right to censor someone for what you just said?

            That’s how the system works, and it does not care how much you or I both hate it.

            The system is like that because you refuse to support third-party support. By you refusing to validate third parties, they don’t have the pull they should have. But if EVERYONE voted third party, guess what? Shit would start to change. You are actually part of the problem, not the solution.

            Nobody was trying to “control people’s opinions;” we were trying to stop you from making an objective mathematical error that would destroy us all.

            And how did that work out for you? What ended up happening?

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              The choices were only “vote for Harris” or “help Trump.”
              Or vote third party.

              That’s a lie. “Vote third party” is a subset of “help Trump.”

              • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Thanks for proving my point. I bet ya miss the lemmy times right before the 2024 election, huh? I bet you hate seeing how many people are pro-third party these days! lolol EDIT: A little too much snark, but poster is definitely showing how angry some people can be when it comes to third-party talk.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  No, I don’t. Why? Because NOW is the time that we SHOULD be trying to replace the neoliberals!

                  Could you quit your trolling for just a goddamn second and actually COMPREHEND what I’ve been writing?!

                  • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Because NOW is the time that we SHOULD be trying to replace the neoliberals!

                    Then maybe you should stop being pissed off and yelling at people who support other parties.

                    Could you quit your trolling for just a goddamn second and actually COMPREHEND what I’ve been writing?!

                    So disagreeing with you is “trolling”?! I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

    • Velma@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep. And let’s not forget, just as recently as a year ago, Lemmy would ban people for saying “both parties suck.”

      Oh interesting. Good to know.

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I realize I’m late so am just responding here for posterity, but - while I’m open to evidence - in my experience the people who were banned were clearly or very likely bad faith astroturf and propaganda accounts. They were clearly trying to split the vote, depress left turnout, and would just repeat LLM-generated junk rather than respond to any good faith debate.

        And I think the bans were right in retrospect because the timed (not typically perma) bans expired and those people still magically disappeared completely from Lemmy after the election.

        In the end, they probably did their job. Trump is in office destroying the country/world, and right now there are probably real people in this thread who think their “both sides” opinions are being censored in part because of the echoes of the noise those bad faith agents made way back in 2024.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          And I think the bans were right in retrospect because the timed (not typically perma) bans expired

          Lol, no they weren’t/didn’t.

          and those people still magically disappeared completely from Lemmy after the election.

          Lol, no we didn’t.

        • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          very likely bad faith astroturf and propaganda accounts.

          And that’s the same tired argument that was made then. Why do you find it so hard to accept that some people just aren’t onboard with either of the two main parties? Look around. Tide is turning. Lots of people on Lemmy now are open to third parties now. Are they all propaganda accounts too?!

          This is why you all lost the fucking election. Because you can’t wrap your head around the fact that you may be wrong about things.

          Facts: Lemmy had about 40,000–50,000 monthly active users worldwide in November 2024. There were 236 MILLION U.S. citizens voting-age. 154+ MILLION actual ballots cast. Third-party advocates made an even smaller slice of that already microscopic global user base. It’s utterly ludicrous for anyone to think that third-party voters on Lemmy could have split the vote or had any meaningful say whatsoever in the presidential election.

          Yet you are ok with them being censored because you were scared of them. How’d that work out? They were banned, and guess what? Trump still won. Again.

          those people still magically disappeared completely from Lemmy after the election.

          I was told I would “disappear” after the election. Maybe it looks like I did because I had to create a new username (not for ban evading–I actually blocked the instances I was banned from). But here I am.

          Am I a ‘propaganda’ account, still going, 2 years after the election?

          Not only that, but I see lots of people being accused of being alts of those ‘propaganda’ posters. So did they really disappear if their alts are everywhere? Hmmm…

          You want democrats to win the next election? Then pick a candidate who can win. You all lost to Trump twice. Think about that.

          Also, even if every single person who voted third party, changed their vote to Harris, she still would have lost. That’s how big the margin of her loss was. Lemmy wasn’t even close to making a dent in any of that, so to blame Lemmy posters for it is crazy.

          • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It costs next to nothing to include Lemmy in a social media astroturf and propaganda campaign, and is even easier and more effective because the small userbase means people’s posts are viewed less suspiciously (case in point: Your entire “the userbase is too small lolol” argument here). I am absolutely certain a few people I interacted with during that time were astroturf, MAGA-in-disguise or propaganda accounts. Re-read the part of my reply about necessary but not sufficient causation, to address your “third party vote” argument (I said nothing about third party voters, note, but you also ignore depressed turnout).

            But to get a little meta: I’m engaging in good faith discussion and giving reasons for my arguments. And you come here, respond to me twice (edit: three times?) with condescending derision when I wasn’t even talking to or about you, and are making an illogical claim that a 50K userbase somehow means Lemmy is immune from propaganda (whether state or individual). You then downvote me, which I didn’t do to anyone I disagree with here. It’s childish and petty.

            We are two people who probably want the same left-based outcomes and have disagreements on the method to get there, but you’re ranting to me about random things in this thread that I didn’t even say. You’re being extremely unpleasant, unkind and uncivil. I stand by what I said.

            Second edit: Seeing your profile and comment about being banned, here’s a direct question: Did you go by the username UniversalMonk prior to the election? The MO, aggressive response style, and AI-generated profile stuff is almost identical.