Snopes debunking

They have a collection of old FotL-logos in there, can’t really tell which one you’re describing.

Sounds like popping bubble wrap, or popcorn.

Edit: According to Wikipedia, the final stance now is that the wound was caused by a stray bullet.

No link provided, so I looked it up. It’s in the article Attempted assassination of Donald Trump in Pennsylvania, under Shooting (pretty deep in there though):

The upper part of Trump’s right ear was grazed by the first bullet Crooks fired.^{[99][100][101]}

Because the writer is convincing themselves to take a course of action by looking at the worst case scenario and finding it not too bad. It’s meaningless to argue

“I should try it because this bad thing could happen”,

unlike

“I should try it because this bad thing is the worst that could happen”.

Jesus, that poster! I was sure the black woman was drawn by Rob Liefeld, but wrong decade I guess

To clarify, you get the slop if you click “View details about correlation #NNNN”

You really should have a last “don’t” at the beginning of point c.

“You dare?!”

“I shouldn’t have to tell you about my expertise for you to find my input valuable!” Weird hill to die on, but okay

No, this is a new image - you’d notice if you compared them. Also, do you actually believe the slop Trump posted is effective propaganda to anyone but his cult following?

I can see being against this post because AI. Your point, not so much.

It’s ridiculous, it literally looks like an AI was asked to Chad-ify Trump.

Edit: Spelling

I was trying to be polite, and leave room in case I had misunderstood. A simple clarification of what you meant would have sufficed.

Show more

attach women

Did you mean ‘attack’?