Hey fellow Europeans,

I’ve been toying around with the idea of a new European military alliance that explicitly does not include the US. Basically a replacenent for NATO. If such an organisation were to exist, how would you define its framework/scope?

Specifically:

  • What would you call it? I like EDO (European Defense Organisation)
  • Membership: EU-only vs. broader Europe (e.g. UK, Norway, Balkans… Canada?)?
  • Command structure: centralized? federated?
  • Thoughts on a possible nuclear doctrine?
  • Funding through proportional contributions? Or rather a unified defense budget?
  • Legal basis: treaty-based like NATO or integrated into EU structures? Both may have their advantages.

I am interested in hearing your thoughts and ideas on the topic.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It should invite everyone but the US, China, and Russia. Everyone. Hell, even North Korea should be welcome.

    Make it a gigantic defensive pact against the superpowers, that requires some high supermajority (70%?) for compelled action. That’d be enough of a deterrent to keep signers from attacking each other, I think, and probably the superpowers from trying anything explicit.

    • stoicEuropean@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the problem with this would be soft power. A super power just needs to expand its sphere of influence to pull 10-20% of the signed countries on it’s side. If a second super power does the same, the whole alliance is left paralyzed and unable to invoke anything. But I like the Idea of a world wide alliance.