Now that this community has mods, I think we should come to something approaching a consensus on whether there should be a rule against posting “nice” comics from transphobic and other kinds of bigoted artists. People like Stonetoss and Jago who have a lot of innocent-looking relatable comics, but also post the most mean, bigoted propaganda.

And I’d like to present a third option besides yes and no: one might post comics from bigoted artists after removing the artist credit, if the mods think that’s a good compromise.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are many comics in the world. Banning a handful of horrible creators won’t starve the community for content. It will create space for non-horrible artists.

    Allowing the “nice” comics by horrible people just creates a funnel for people to click though and be exposed to hateful ideas.

    If in several months the ban list has grown monstrous in size, we could revisit, but that seems unlikely.

    It’s not book burning or censorship. The horrible creators remain entitled to host their own websites or their own instances.

      • Kobibi@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Because a comics sub on Lemmy is not the government or a church or any other powerful organisation that has any reach beyond itself

        It’s a small community of people who are allowed to decide not to welcome bigotry

        • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Ohhhhh so when its just a few people its okay to ignore things they dont like. Quick, hid that info from billion dollar fossil fuel advocates! They must never know the power of ignoring inconvenient reality. Imagine how well they’d sleep at night

          • Kobibi@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            If I step into your group of friends one evening and start an unprompted 4 hour lecture on 17th Century Agriculture, would it be censorship if you asked me to leave?

            Small communities are allowed to curate themselves. It’s not censorship without that power dynamic, and on some level you yourself must understand this since your go-to comparison was ‘billion dollar fossil fuel advocates’

            • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Curating would require active moderation. This isnt a proposal for increased moderation, but a content based ban decided by which artists are or are not haram to your leftist sensibilities at any given time. Why should the lemmy.world instance of comicstrips be censored when you can make a new instance like “safestripsforgoodboysandgirls” instead of fucking over the larger community?

              • Kobibi@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Why should the lemmy.world instance of comicstrips be censored when you can make a new instance like “safestripsforgoodboysandgirls” instead of fucking over the larger community?

                If most people here are in favour of it, then that’s why.

                And then you can leave and make a new instance with your preferred amount of bigotry

          • mlc894@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            “If we don’t flood the front page with Nazi stuff, we’re as bad as the Nazis” was always my least favorite argument.

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Will you write “I’m an idiot” on your forehead for me? If not, am I being censored? Why or why not? Should you be obligated to carry my message anywhere I desire?

        • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nobody should be obligated to parrot your mouth diarrhea, no. But that does not mean its okay for an entire community to discourage your mouth diarrhea simply for being distasteful.

          That’s censorship, just in case you were having trouble identifying the concept we are discussing.

            • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 day ago

              Personal preference is not censorship. Banning an artist from an artistic community because the community can’t regulate their own emotions is censorship.

              • jtrek@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                So the individuals running a forum cannot moderate the forum. It must be open to any and all content. Otherwise that is censorship, and bad.

                Well, I infer from your tone you think censorship is always bad. Maybe you’re just splitting a hair about how in a sense content moderation is censorship.

                because the community can’t regulate their own emotions is censorship.

                The biggest eyeroll

                • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  My big problem with censorship is that it dulls the mind. Safe spaces do the same thing. If your thoughts and beliefs are never questioned, you can never grow as a person. Echo chambers are breeding grounds for ignorance. Our world is not tolerant of ignorance. Being unable to react appropriately to emotionally inflammatory bait makes us all weaker on an emotional level.

                  If you want to coddle yourself, make a safe space to do so. Don’t take an open forum and limit it to suit your preferences. The internet is infinite. Make a new space with your own rules.

                  • jtrek@startrek.website
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Make a new space with your own rules

                    That’s what’s happening here and you’re whining about it. Follow your own advice.

                    My big problem with censorship is that it dulls the mind. Safe spaces do the same thing. If your thoughts and beliefs are never questioned, you can never grow as a person. Echo chambers are breeding grounds for ignorance. Our world is not tolerant of ignorance. Being unable to react appropriately to emotionally inflammatory bait makes us all weaker on an emotional level.

                    Also this is nonsense. Some topics don’t need to be relitigated. No one benefits from giving “maybe {racist trope} is real” a platform and legitimacy.

                    Furthermore, allowing stuff like Nazi ideas is corrosive to the community. Like the anecdote about the Nazi bar posted elsewhere, if you let that stuff in then you end up with all the other people leaving.

                    You are wrong and your ideas are counter productive for maintaining a vibrant community. Many left wing spaces ban Nazi apologia, and have no shortage of debate and competing thought.

                    Claiming your opponents are just emotionally weak is also laughable. You sound like a real sad sack neo-nazi incel projecting his own shortcomings.