• KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s not that he lost… it’s not that he started it because putin told him to… it’s not even that his moron running the “war department” is an alcohol addled butt sucking asshole…

    It’s because of all the goddam taxpayer money he threw DOWN THE FUCKING COMMODE on the death merchants. What? Did Raytheon need to clear out some old inventory?

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, they’re still sending out a newsletter and doing decent articles on their webpage but they’re low on fundraising.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    What? Pretty sure Afghanistan was lost too?? Or are we using strategic ambiguity in new ways?

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The war was won, the person you handed the reigns to just ran away so fast when the enemy came it appeared like it was you being run out of the country.

    • Heikki2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The way I interpret this is single-handedly lost the war. Afghanistan was over 4 presidents (Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden). The sloppy withdrawal by Biden was die to no planning and a treaty signed by Trump to do so by 2/29/2020.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        If that’s the case, then Nixon didn’t single handily lose the Vietnam War either.

        But let’s be real. The Democrat president who inherits this war in 2028 will be the one blamed for loosing it.

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    um what? america has only won 2 wars against a guerrilla force of their own terf in the last 100 years.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Hows our “Project for a new American century” coming along? Seems it wasnt as easy as just writing down all the things we lusted after and grabbing them via pure hubris.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          yes, inevitably casting “principled” god-fearing maga people as the real victims in all of this, who are always calm and dignified, and never ever wanted any violence, but the outcome was forced on them… by muslim and woke democrat terrorists who were the real epstein pedophiles all along. We can have an AI write this movie in about 5 minutes. I bet Noah Wiley would agree to play Hegseth.

  • mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    No one’s done that since Nixon? Would you call Afghanistan a victory? Although that was also Trump.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You yanks REALLY need to lose this one. Your noses need to be rubbed in it. You need to feel the SHIT you put the rest of us though. And you need to get seriously angry at the Israelis and rub THEIR noses in it. You need a big enough shock to CHANGE.

    (Like I know most of the people on Lemmy are not Republican idiots. I’m obviously not talking about you personally, but about the «general public opinion» in the US, especially the Republican idiots.)

    • brownsugga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The US committed a war crime on day one, and Israel has been on a war crime spree since Oct 7… if this turns into a world war, it’ll be that Mitchell and Webb skit… “are we the baddies?”

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They don’t care. It’s a video game to most Americans. That’s what having oceans between you and the bombs does.

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      In America, we punish the incumbents. BoTh PaRtIeS have told their own constituents to fuck off; membership of registered voters is at 30% each. Independents are now 40% of voters.

      Whoever wins the election tells the people who elected them to fuck off; so, we vote them out. That’s it. The new election winner then tells the people who elected them to fuck off, and so on.

      Examples: Biden runs with minimum wage increase as platform, wins, then tells everybody to fuck off.

      Trump then runs with “no war” as platform; wins, goes to war and tells his voters to fuck off.

      He will be replaced by a Democrat, who will then also tell their voters to fuck off.

      Repeat ad nauseam. Neither party does what they are elected to do and are then punished, to be replaced by the other party that will refuse to do what they were elected to do.

      We can’t vote ourselves out of this, unfortunately.

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I agree with the incumbent part, but exactly how was Biden able to pass minimum wage law but decided not to? It can’t go in reconciliation and they didn’t have the votes for it in the Senate.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        He will be replaced by a Democrat, who will then also tell their voters to fuck off.

        The real political innovation here is that the Democratic party is telling its voters to fuck off before the next election.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They don’t have anything to loose. Another Republican president? Great! They can sit on their asses for four more years writing angry tweets about how offended they are while telling voters to fuck off. Democrats win? Even better! Sit on their asses while insider trading and taking billionaire tributes while telling voters to fuck off. What a great system we have.

    • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      …I’m not sure Europe would be better off if Iran was controlled by Russia, and I’m not sure if an independent Iran is a realistic option. At the end of the day, it seems like Europe needs the oil more than America does.

      I sort of agree though. I haven’t heard a compelling argument as to why we are interfering in Europe’s problems. They have the strength of character to take on countries like Iran and Russia.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Europe didn’t fight Israel’s war against Iran for it. Europe was quite happy leaving Iran alone, having the odd awkward diplomatic discussion. Europe was happy buying oil and related good from the gulf states as needed.

        The US need to lose because they shat the bed.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Even more, Europe and the US had a goddamn deal with Iran that now sounds like an unrealistically optimistic scenario.

    • DillDough@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You’re being too lenient. It’s not just Republicans, they’re only 1/3 of the population, the even bigger issue is the “moderate” and “apolitical” people that make up another 1/3…these people will loudly oppose anything and everything but blatant extreme right wing authoritarianism, in fact they’ll get more upset about the final 1/3 of the population that’s against authoritarianism than they will ever get at literal dictators.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And you represent the real problem, in my opinion.

        bOtH pArTiEs need to stop treating independents like shit. It doesn’t help you. You REQUIRE independents to win, perhaps you should stop treating them with contempt? Maybe do what they want… like stop supporting Israel?

        You might THINK not supporting Israel is “blatant extreme right wing authoritarianism”, but independents don’t agree with you. Have a little respect… a tiny bit.

        Just an idea.

        • CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I think you’re way overestimating the consistency of independents in the US when it comes to Israel. See recent Gallup figures from February. It’s only in the last year that net sentiment seems to cut against support for Israel.

          This seems to come up a bit. Disaffected voters recognize that neither dominant party represents them, see that others feel the same way, and then seemingly assume that the other disaffecteds share their opinion on x or y. If only the party would align with me on this topic, they’d bring over all the independents! It’s not that simple of an equation for many issues.

          This isn’t to say Democrats to a good job at triangulating public will or building a coalition. They do not.

  • spitfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m going to disagree with just one thing: the regime hasn’t really changed. But it isn’t and never was US&A’s fucking business. Change your own first ;)

  • axx@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The number of trackers this site wants you to accept and load is insane. I know it’s not that unusual these days, but fuck that, i’m not putting up with your clearly malicious interpretation of legitimate interest to see one article.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I wonder how much better would he fare had he assisted the protester, in time, like he promised, instead of letting them get massacred only to start his own thing a few months later.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    21 hours ago

    In Afghanistan, Trump unconditionally surrendered to the Taliban, but left Biden to complete the withdrawal. Before that, Iraq was either a loss or a stalemate, depending on what the poorly articulated objectives actually were.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The US “won” in WW2 because they managed to pick the winning team. There was a significant pro-nazi faction in the country at the time and it wasn’t really until Japan attacked Pear Harbour that they really picked a side and went all-in on it. Before that, they were fine with selling stuff to Nazi Germany, and Japan for that matter.

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The wars were won in both cases. Decisively.

      Hearts and minds were not won, in either case. There is a good question whether the nationbuilding could even theoretically have succeeded, given how tribal and divided the countries were. IMO it was stupid to try in the first place, especially in Afghanistan.

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        We keep entering conflicts with no clear objective because our leadership lies about our reasons for entering the conflict. In both cases we had no hard evidence they were even continuing development of nuclear weapons.

        We defeated their military and occupied their countries, but winning implies completing an objective successfully. When we exited Afghanistan the Taliban instantly took control. They completed their objective, they won the war.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Every $10 increase in crude translates to roughly 24 cents per gallon at the pump. So we’re looking at 25 to 45 cents per gallon — baked in, structural, not going away when the war ends, not going away when the headlines fade, not going away ever.

    Can we stop with this narrative that this is somehow a bad thing?

    The price of oil has been too low. calculate the cost if externalities, and the price should be close to infinity.

    Just stop oil.

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Food prices are still tied to fossil fuel prices. This will cause a lot of very real pain, among the poorest in the world.

      So yes, we need to get to net zero carbon. But there has to be a more humane way than unplanned cold turkey.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s only cold turkey now because we haven’t done it in the last 50 years.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That time has passed. It was supposed to be a slow transition since 1970s.

        Now the only option is to just stop now.

        And most of the world’s food is produced locally. For those few heavily industrialized countries that chose to centralize their food systems to be dependent on fossil fuels, they have enough wealth to give free food to their poor populations.

        • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          And most of the world’s food is produced locally.

          …With imported nitrogen fertilizer made from fossil fuel. And with farm machines burning imported oil. And transported even to local market using imported fuel.

          • quick_snail@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Nope. False misinformation (though common misconception).

            Most of the world’s food systems never adopted the broken “green revolution”. They’re local and mostly organic.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    No one wins when people start shooting at each other. There are only different degrees of losing. There is no glory in war, only suffering of the poor for the rich.

  • hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think this article forgets how Trump effectively surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban the last time around.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        eh. might be 55% Biden 45% Trump, 50/50? 60/40? but really it hardly matters. These last two presidents had the legitimate authority and tools to see the right thing done regardless of zionist funding pressure and they both decided to actively do war crimes and take the bribes instead of doing whats right. Neither is worthy of any leadership position, and they should both be in prison in orange jumpsuits for crimes against humanity. This is what weak and unprincipled leaders get us. These two incompetent arrogant idiots may be the end of all of us.

      • Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Which is really weird considering wasn’t he literally following the timeline Trump set out? A timeline that was almost certainly concocted to screw over the Democrat if Trump lost and that Trump wouldn’t have actually stuck to if he won?

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Trump wouldn’t have actually stuck to if he won?

          Funny how you say that…

          It is on Biden, he didn’t have to stick to Trump’s controversial deal with the Taliban, he could have had a spine and given a statement about how he supports bringing the troops home but that leaving Afghanistan in the hands of the Taliban will only put them at more risk in the future and how Trump made a fool of us by dealing with them. But no, every liberal has to treat Biden like he has no agency, like he didn’t continue negotiating with the Taliban and eventually gave the final withdrawl orders leaving locals who helped the US to fend for themselves.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            19 hours ago

            This thread is full of the most absolutely bizarre takes imaginable.

            The war in Afghanistan was a complete failure from start to finish and was only ever about making more money for arms manufacturers and oil companies. At literally any point in the decades long occupation, the best thing to do would be to immediately withdraw. The decision to withdraw was one of the best policy decisions any president has made in my lifetime (an admittedly low bar). I was hoping and praying for that decision for literally 20 years of my life. Personally, I’d tend to credit Biden with it since he was the one who actually followed through and accepted the political fallout from all the psychopathic hawks in the media.

            And I come in here and the two sides are, “Biden good because [incredibly good and necessary decision] was actually Trump’s fault!” vs “Biden bad because [incredibly good and necessary decision] was Biden’s fault!”

            How on earth has everyone in here come to this conclusion that if we prolonged the war even another 20 years, we could accomplish something we completely and utterly failed to do in that time? Even our own puppet government was telling us to leave. If you want to blame someone for losing the war, blame Bush, because the war was already lost within the first year at most. I literally cannot comprehend how anyone could look at that situation and want us to stay unless they were directly profiting from it.

            Rationally, I know that liberals are bloodthirsty warmongerers who worship Khorne and want to build mountains of skulls and all, but like aren’t you supposed to keep up some kind of pretence of not just wanting to turn a country into a perpetual slaughterhouse?

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            It was a no-win situation. If he stayed, the Republicans who pretended to care about war being a bad thing would have raked him over the coals about throwing out future FIFA peace prize recipient Donald Trump’s flawless exit strategy.

            And we see that when he went through with it anyway what a fucking mess it was, and they blamed him for it imploding anyway.

            I’m of the firm opinion that we could have occupied Afghanistan for a century and the result upon exiting would have resulted in the exact same outcome. There were perhaps better ways to do a drawdown that wouldn’t result in leaving billions of dollars worth of military hardware, vehicles and munitions behind for the Taliban to sieze and use for themselves, but it still eventually had to happen and we got what we got.

            Democracy can’t be given to someone else. It must be hard fought for and won by the people themselves, or it’s value will never become apparent to them.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Don’t mention any decency from Biden. It’ll ruin the narrative.

          You could just as easily say, “Don’t mention any decency from Hitler. It’ll ruin the narrative.”

          Theres a reason people aren’t aware of a lot of the actually good things Hitler did. If you can figure out why those things arent mentioned these days, you will understand why people dont dwell on the good things Biden did.

          Here is the stuff I’m talking about:

          • Championed animal welfare causes.
          • An anti-smoking crusader.
          • An early champion of many environmental causes.
          • A notable champion of the wisdom of infrastructure spending and infrastructure bills in general, just like Biden.
          • An avid fan of the arts.

          I will spot you a hint though: Biden/Hitler/ Trump all share a common problem, its one word, starts w a “G” and ends in “cide”.