Well, you did it for your partners experience, but it didn’t need to be. As the choice is yours.

Some people were saying they like it hairy and that you should think about your partner before shaving. I don’t think that’s right.

If we talk the same language and there is the spark of interest, I don’t see why not. non-binary is all about breaking these barriers, correct?

Why are people talking about partners when this is a own body choice? This is creepy.

He is his best fan.

Seeing China (Tencent) and the US (Lightspeed LA) working together really gives me hope that everything will turn up alright.

The idea is that in a populist scenario the command chain of a dictator-like government has to repeat exactly what the leader says. And that would come from the responsible authoritarian leaders being representatives for the people. But in a way that they are the people. And that comes from a strong “I am you” image projected by the authoritarian leader.

I will elaborate more on this later as it interests me profoundly.

Thankfully, the literature on it is quite extense. I have prepared some books to read on the “Authoritarian Personality” and on the “Sociology of Power”. It is just a shower thought after all.

Luckily I’ll be able to make sense of this and produce something that will make it able for people to understand it as well.

A blog post, a Lemmy comment, something like that.

do you think this is interesting? people clearly have a strong opinion about it given the downvotes.

I’d rather not.

That is already enough of a reason for a distinguished study. If a populist leader wants to force their core leaders and fellow party members into going along completely with them, that’s already reason enough for a deep cut in morality, ethics and integrity.

In a populist setting, where the politician says to the people that gather around her/him “I am like you”, they do this for the sole purpose of forcing the other interested members of a party to say “I am like you” as well.

I think the exact opposite. Saying that “democracy isn’t for us” banishes any kind of democracy that could happen in the country. It even bans the possibility that there is a right way of democracy for the country.

The current crimes linked to western democracy are just connected to the current state of democracy. That Burkina Faso shouldn’t buy into a democracy that kills, that doesn’t build hospitals, and so on. That doesn’t mean the concept of democracy cannot change for implementation on the country for the future.

Anyway, exact opposite.