I’m only half kidding. I’m a bit of a prepper and I have lots of powerbanks and devices that charge from USB but besides idling my truck I really had no other way to charge any of them in case of a long-term power outage which seemed a bit of an oversight on my part.

Not like this solves the issue. 30 watts (under ideal conditions) isn’t much but it’s a start.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        OP probably doesn’t. This is something I find odd about replies to stuff like this.

        Hey guys, got 30w! Should be plenty.

        Omg no you need 50kW to run a desalination plant.

        But I have a fresh water spring next to me?

        Yeah but I live next to the dead sea.

        Obviously discussing different use cases and needs is cool, but some seem to try and apply requirements to others when it doesn’t really apply to them.

        • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you actually read this thread it would make more sense right? Are you able to read? Do you know how conversations in a thread work?

          OP says they got 30w, they don’t actually say it “should be plenty” and you just made that up and in fact plainly says “it isn’t much but it is a start”

          The person who replied to them says “Yeah 30 watts isn’t enough. The rule of thumb for off grid is it needs to be able to boil water (12A power station)”

          to which the next person says “If we’re boiling water why not skip the middle man and get a solar kettle?” please note this one because this is where the context for my comment comes from

          then the next person says “Why not wood stove?”

          If you were able to understand how threaded conversations work you’d understand I was agreeing with 9point6@lemmy.world who said why don’t you skip the middle man and get a solar kettle and giving a reason to thatGuyWithGlasses who said why not a wood stove. In some places, like in my specific use case, a solar kettle makes more sense than a wood stove.

          Then you wrote to me your non sequitur post about whatever it is you wrote that doesn’t accurately reflect OP and doesn’t accurately reflect the thread.

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’ve kept the old wood stoves in my house just in case I ever need them. I used them all last winter cause they were all I had at the time. Learned how to chop wood and start a fire and everything. It was kinda fun, but hard work. Defo not something anyone should have to do their whole life, but perhaps something everyone should try once. Quite humbling

      EDIT: I used them for heating. Had to keep a fire going about 3 hours a day in each

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Love my Kelly kettles - yes I have multiple, different sizes. Gathering wood to boil enough hot water to make tea for 6 people? About 30 seconds of work. Once you have filled 1 hand with sticks and twigs that is about enough firewood.

      • EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        My primary heat source is the wood stove. I have my heat pump as back up.

        I have a 400 yo oak tree shading by home and a metal roof so I only need to turn on the ac from 5-8pm in the hottest days of summer.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wood is a potentially scarce resource, access to it is situational, it requires significant storage space, wood smoke is bad for you, fire is dangerous and requires skill to manage that can take a long time to learn, same goes for the process of preparing the wood.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Depends a lot on what you are making and how. Haybox cookers require very little fuel. Just get the food up to almost boiling point and that is all the fuel you need.

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I looked up haybox cookers, seems like a neat idea to insulate already boiling water, but a wood fire doesn’t seem like the most convenient or efficient choice if what you want is to efficiently heat something up a specific amount but no more.

          • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Just light a small fire and keep it pretty small and it can burn out once you are done.

            I use a Kelly kettle stove a lot, tiny fire but still a few thousand watts of thermal energy. A few sticks at a time as fuel.