• billybob@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Could anyone explain to me how Trump is able to tell people wind and solar are more dangerous than coal and oil and they believe him? Shouldn’t a 5th grader be able to know the difference?

    • fishy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      I’ve had the displeasure of taking to MAGA people. They are indeed dumber than a fifth grader.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Trump has said a lot of dumb things. Among some of the dumbest are the suggestion of shining UV lights inside the body or injecting bleach to cure COVID (this one’s a two-fer) and the suggestion that windmills cause cancer.

  • SuperZorro@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Denmark is big on wind power, and its extra windy these days, so electricity is basically free right now. But yeah, such a hoax. /s

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Well, when the world’s most obviously idiotic leader calls someone or something “stupid”, those people or things should bear serious consideration

  • j_elgato@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Right, his revenge vendetta against… the wind.

    I don’t remember what the fuck that’s about: Is that one of the important ones that we need to keep track of like how he fucks little kids or wants to invade Canada, or is that one just background noise that can be safely ignored like how he pretends to be tall or how he wants to fuck his own daughter?

    God, I’m so tired…

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s literally about how Scotland refused to tear down the wind farm that was off the coast of his golf course there. He said it ruined the view.

      So because of that: no new wind power in the US.

      Isn’t it awesome having to live according to the whims of a malignant narcissist who acts like a fucking 6 year old?

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m 99% sure trump is against wind because Scotland built some near his golf course and he, once again, decided to be an absolute toddler about it

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15l3knp4xyo

    Honestly if he wasn’t such an all-round, existential threat to humanity, you’d almost have to be impressed with how far he has managed to get powered by pure spite.

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’m 99% sure trump is against wind because Scotland built some near his golf course

      No. The far right and the fossil fuel industry have entered a deadly symbiosis. The far right wants to undo democracy. The fossil fuel industry wants to continue to make profits, even at the cost of millions of lives. Because climate change is a deadly risk to our civilization, they can’t do that in a democracy. And that’s why they did become allies to undo democracy, and why people like the Koch Brothers, Robert Mercer, UK’s Nigel Farage, and Steve Bannon do work together. Or why for example Germany’s AfD is working together with both Trump and Putin, or Austrian right-wing people were caught on videos discussing campaigns with Russians.

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The fossil fuel industry wants to continue to make profits

        and because renewables just don’t give the same guaranteed profit level as fossil fuels.

        Returns on investments in fossil fuels typically range between 10-20 percent, while for a renewables project, 5-8 percent is the norm, Reuters reported in June 2023.

          • BillyClark@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            There’s also a huge barrier to entry in fossil fuels, since the existing industry owns the oil wells and refineries.

            Any dumb asshole can just go build a wind turbine.

            • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              There’s also a huge barrier to entry in fossil fuels, since the existing industry owns the oil wells and refineries.

              And the patents you need to license to build them.

              • BillyClark@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Well, patents only last for 20 years. I’m sure they have newer processes that have been patented in the last 20 years, but I’m also sure that they are using refineries more than 20 years old.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well partially it’s because of that, but also because he’s taking a lot of kickbacks from the fossil fuel industry who are desperate to stay relevant, the irony of course is that because he doesn’t know what he’s doing he’s gone started a war with a petro state that has reduced global supply by 25% and increase the likelihood of people moving over to wind turbines and solar panels for power and electric vehicles for transport.

    • manxu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s weird though that he kept on going with this particular vendetta. Usually, he forgets everything after three minutes, unless he perceived it as a personal insult. But what insult could wind farms possibly have lobbed his way?

    • mimavox@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Generally, rich a-holes don’t like wind because it disturbes the view from their properties. Really selfish and dumb, of course.

    • BenjiRenji@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s not that simple. The US produces more oil than ever, other oil production is suffering (in Venezuela, Russia, Iran, other Middle Eastern countries). Trump wants the US to replace them despite not having enough and the right refinery capacity).

      When is he going to sabotage Norway?

      • ximtor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        He just needs to finance a big ad campaign and most of Norway will be on board with almost anything. There are “traditions” here based on ad campaigns, it would be funny if it wouldn’t be so stupid

        • Fluke@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Like a red and white “Santa Claus”? Giving diamonds upon engagement for marriage? Chocolate eggs at Easter?

          Mate, it’s universal.

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And yet his war on iran has now driven everyone to maximize efforts on alternative energy sources.

    Keep it going dumb-ass. Dispite all your efforts you might -indirectly- become the greenest president anywhere ever.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    only reaction to anything that pissface says should just be SHUT UP. Complete excommunication.

  • janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It looks like those wind generators are anchored somewhere below the surface which makes sense. Could you attach something along the shaft that will rise and fall with the surface level to also help generate power? I know ive seen theoretical machines that can harness waves for energy and it seems like you could combine these two methods into one apparatus

    • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Of course you could, but the energy math only really makes sense if you scale it up.

      Most tidal energy projects involve damming a bay or reservoir and extracting energy with turbines as water flows in or out due to the tides.

      • janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I wonder if you could make a grid in 3 dimensions that could harvest energy as the nodes change position relative to each other, almost like a piezoelectric system on a macro scale edit: i’m kinda stoned so the ideas are flowing freely lol

          • janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I was actually thinking about something like that recently. I read a book by Peter Hamilton that had biomechanoid space ships incubating in jovian orbit because of the radiation, and then the other day there was an article somewhere about (potentially) radiotrophic fungi in the chernobyl exclusion zone and I was thinking you could line a spacecraft/station with that stuff. I guess it’s no surprise that melanin is just stupid good at absorbing ionizing radiation since that’s what is has evolved to do

  • DandomRude@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    That’s actually a solid rule of thumb when you’re not sure: if the plan aims to do the exact opposite of what the orange mob boss says, it can’t be anything but a good plan.

    • crandlecan@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Sadly, it is not. The disturbances to oceanic life are too big. We should build them on land only.

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        One has to see that in proportion. Oceans that are several degrees warmer due to greenhouse emissions would for sure mean a sixth mass extinction of life on Earth.

      • gsv@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s a much reduced statement. Construction noise is indeed a massive disturbance, which is why there’s a lot of efforts on mitigation it. Once the plant is running, however, it has been observed to work as an artificial reef increasing the local populations. To increase the effect there’s some work on adding boulders in between the monopiles. Another reason is that power boats are (depends on country) often forbidden to enter which actually reduces the noise disturbance within the area. There’s also effects on some species (lower trophic levels) due to the local reduction in wind speed in the wake which modifies the amount of mixing in the surface. That is, however, an active field of research. Long story short: fields of wind power plants are depending on the current life stage a disturbance but have in some sites been observed to be the opposite once operating. A conclusion to only build them on land could hardly be drawn at this time.

      • Jiral@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Wind power on see has vastly better energy reliability.

        What do you prefer instead? Burning biomass, heavy use of mining for massively larger battery facilities, very destructive water reservoires with pumping stations, building large overcapacities of wind power on land, or even burning fossile fuels? Some other option?

        Please tell us your choice.

          • 4am@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Yes cute “let’s melt billionaires” we all agree

            That doesn’t feed society though. It removes a lot of barriers sure but the runoff alone will kill sea life