Engineers are confident that shutting down the LECP will give Voyager 1 about a year of breathing room. They are using the time to finalize a more ambitious energy-saving fix for both Voyagers they call “the Big Bang,” which is designed to further extend Voyager operations. The idea is to swap out a group of powered devices all at once — hence the nickname — turning some things off and replacing them with lower-power alternatives to keep the spacecraft warm enough to continue gathering science data.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It’s quite a feat of engineering to have something run this long - and without having physical access to it.

  • HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is so fuking cool

    I am filled with pride that we collectively made something that will likely out live our sun, and we continue to find ingenious ways to keep it going and going

    What a cool time to be alive

    • nuachtan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I remember when both Voyagers were making their fly bys. We’d get a bunch of images in magazines and stuff, and then wait several more years for the next planet. Between that and the Space Shuttle flights it was awesome.

      I wasn’t around for the moon landings so Skylab and Voyager were the highlights of my days.

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Why can’t we be as forward thinking as the people who created the voyager probes?

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Voyager 1 was launched in 1977 - just before the Reagan era. Coincidence?

      Also, and I’m still just guessing here, it’s probably the culmination of the space race to the moon minus the pressure to be there before the Russians.

      In other words, NASA’s Golden Age.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Also, the tech was “just right” then. Small and frugal enough to fit on a probe but still robust enough to survive more than a few years in space.

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Now please show an inflation adjusted graph or better one that shows in percentage how much each fraction owns of the wealth pie.

        • Pyrodexter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It actually doesn’t really show much, except maybe that inflation exists and people generally have more money now.

          If it’s supposed to show how the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer, it does a lousy job. It’s practically impossible to see the relative change between the groups, since the lower two graphs’ behaviors are impossible to see. The only thing that can at least somewhat be seen is that the top 10% and the top 1% grow quite correspondingly.

          So, basically that graph shows that everything seems to be as fair as it has always been. Probably wasn’t the intention, and certainly not a good representation of what’s happening. It’s very possible that the top 1% is included also in the top 10% and dominates it, but just based on that graph it’s impossible to know.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      not enough engineers use LSD anymore because they’ll lose their entire career over it and be blacklisted from government contracts forever.

      the McCarthys won.

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    One would think we should just ship it some upgraded parts on a door dash rocket, since we presumably have far better technology now.

    No? No? Oh well I guess the USA is not that great then,

    • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The problem is that you’re not just sending parts out there. You have to:

      • get the upgrade rocket going fast enough to actually catch up with something going very fast with a 20 year head start
      • slow down once you get to it.
      • make the upgrades while floating in space on a piece of hardware that was designed not to be upgraded and built on earth (hope you don’t need gravity for disassembly) that you control on a 30 minute delay.

      At that point we could just launch a whole new satellite with better hardware, going faster, and covering a completely different area of space. Which is what we have done. But we can still make use of the system we have out there. It’s still the furthest out, so it’s still worth using for as long as we can

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        We haven’t sent anything away from the sun faster than Voyager 1. It’s still the fastest.

        • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Isn’t a major challenge of trying to surpass Voyager 1 that it had extremely good conditions for slingshotting off a lot of planets?

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yes, although we have ion thrusters now, so theoretically we could use something like that to get something going very fast over a long time. A little acceleration constantly over a long time goes a long way.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I was actually looking into this a little bit recently and it turns out the Voyager spacecraft launched with 23 watt radio transmitters but at the distance it takes a 72 meter dish to capture the signal and at its capture it is one attowatt. I don’t remember my system right offhand, but it’s something like a billionth of a billionth of a watt. It’s stupidly small.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      17 hours ago

      So far away that it takes an entire day to get the signal to it. The earth to the sun is 8 minutes.

      And somehow we can still talk to it. It’s amazing.

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This, coupled with the improbable idea that it could be “found” someday, has got to be one of the most exciting and magical concepts in science ever

      1-2 day ETA for an interstellar telegram lol

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    22 hours ago

    NASA’s Voyager engineers are like the final evolution of your uncle that keeps his 1974 Chevy C/K running at 400,000 miles. It’s the same autism across an ocean of resources.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Actually basically yes. NASA has had decades of practice at minimum viable operation capability, making their spacecraft and rovers all but drag themselves along even when anything else would stop working.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    23 hours ago

    RTGs are subject to the issue of half-life - this is a consequence of that type of power source. Though, let’s be honest: we do not have any other sort of power generation technology that would be viable for literal decades on an interstellar space probe. And we definitely didn’t have a better alternative when they were launched.

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    which would shut down components on its own to safeguard the probe, requiring recovery by the flight team — a lengthy process that carries its own risks.

    Uhhh… how the fuck are you planning on recovering it?

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think what they mean is that if the thing starts shutting stuff down on its own, the process to get those things started again is tedious. While if the humans tell it to shut things down, it is all more orderly.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That bit confused me as well. I’m thinking in case the launch and deployment failed, they could get it back much more easily

      • mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This thing launched 50 years ago, it and it’s sister probe are farther from earth than anything else by multiple orders of magnitude, they’re literally outside the sun’s influence. We obviously aren’t getting them back so recovery must mean recovery to an operational state

        • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It’s bound to get bored out there, miss us all so much, and turn around at some point, like my dad. Just give it time.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The Voyager mission launched in 1977. If I recall correctly, it takes roughly 80 years for the planets to realign for that purpose. If I didn’t misremember, we’re about halfway through waiting.